LIFE ON MARS -- WHY NOW?The focus, in the ET issue, has shifted from secrecy
to a tightly-controlled release of information.....by Goro Adachi (adachi@cris.com) on August 13, 1996
Table of Contents
1. The NASA Announcement
2. Artificial Structures on Mars
4. Conspiracies Surrounding Mars
6. Overview of Possible Hidden Plan
THE NASA ANNOUNCEMENT
On August 6, 1996, around 3:00 p.m., while I was casually watching CNN, the anchor woman suddenly began talking about life on Mars with a nervous face (it may have been the first report CNN did on this news item). She reported that NASA had found compelling, but non-conclusive, evidence of life on Mars, albeit three billion years ago. "This must be a dream," was my first reaction; I could not believe my ears! Not because I thought life couldn't exist on Mars but because NASA is coming out with this information publicly... at this particular time. This was surprising because, from listening to Richard Hoagland on the radio, I had been expecting a move from NASA for several days before the news was broadcast on CNN.
The next day (August 7), NASA held an official news conference and told the whole world about their earth-shaking discovery. A discovery which begins to answer one of the big questions humankind has been asking..., "Are we alone?" Their evidence, a primitive form of microscopic life that existed on Mars more than three billion years ago, was discovered on a meteorite originally from Mars that fell to earth some 13,000 years ago. They found organic molecules in the meteorite described as fossil traces of past biological activity -- the first time in history we may have found scientific evidence for extraterrestrial life. Many scientists are now calling it the biggest discovery in the history of science! This was huge!
ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURES ON MARS
I was stunned by the announcement. Why, after all the denial and disinformation regarding extraterrestrials and UFOs, did NASA decide to disclose this inconclusive discovery that was certain to lead the public's attention to intelligent ET-life and UFOs? Some speculated this was done to revive public interest in space exploration to promote NASA but I don't think this is correct. NASA had strong circumstantial evidence of ET-life well before its recent announcement. The controversial artificial structures on Mars and the Moon are already supported by strong circumstantial evidence. NASA says this evidence is not strong enough but, if we look at each evidential set, just how compelling are they?
Richard C. Hoagland (founder and principle investigator of an independent space research group called "The Enterprise Mission," author of "The Monuments of Mars," etc.), among others, has been strongly pushing the idea of structures on Mars and the Moon that seem artificial ("The Face on Mars," the "pyramid," etc.). But despite his detailed and logically-sound analysis, NASA has basically ignored or ridiculed his claims. In 1993, Stanley V. McDaniel (Professor Emeritus and former Chairman of the Philosophy Department at a California State University) concluded in his "The McDaniel Report" (a 200-page analysis of the methodology employed by researchers studying enigmatic objects on the surface of Mars and also an analysis of NASA's policy regarding these objects) that the researchers' claims are sound and what they did, according to McDaniel, was how science should work at its best. He also concluded:
"NASA's "evaluation" has consisted largely of initial impressions from unenhanced photographs, heavily weighted by faulty reasoning. NASA has failed to apply any special methods of analysis; it has relied upon flawed reports; it has failed to attempt verification of the enhancements and measurements made by others; and it has focused exclusively on inappropriate methodology which ignores the importance of context. There remains no scientific basis for NASA's position regarding the landforms."(excerpted from The McDaniel Report -- Executive Summary)
Professor McDaniel had no reason to personally favor either NASA or the independent researchers, and the overall integrity of his report was confirmed by many scientists in various fields including geology, physics, and astronomy. Here are some of those mentioned in his report:
Dr. Robert M. Schoch, Associate Professor of Science and Mathematics (geology), Boston University;Dr. Horace Crater, Professor of Physics, University of Tennessee Space Institute;
Dr. David Webb, Professor of Space Education, Research, and Technology at Embry-Riddle University, Daytona Beach, Florida;
Dr. Thomas Van Flandern, former Head, Celestial Mechanics Branch, U.S. Naval Observatory;
James Berkland, former Assistant Professor of Geology, Appalachian State University; and
L.J. Angstrom, great-grandson of physicist A.J. Angstrom and Director of the prestigious Angstrom Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden
If the circumstantial evidence for the structures on Mars is as strong as the circumstantial evidence used in NASA's conclusion with regard to the meteorite from Mars, why the double standard? And, why did NASA decide to go public with their evidence now, right before the launching of two probes to Mars (the Mars Global Surveyor in November, 1996, and the Mars Pathfinder in December, 1996)? Timing seems to be the key....
LIFE ON EUROPA?
It is likely no coincidence that the issue of life on Mars is becoming big news at this precise time. It appears to be part of a bigger plan, by NASA and/or someone in the government, that Richard Hoagland very recently (late-July, 1996) talked about. According to Hoagland, NASA was soon to make a major announcement regarding the discovery of life on Europa (one of Jupiter's moons) when the spacecraft Galileo again approaches and probes Europa (Galileo's close flybys of Europa will occur December 19, 1996, February 20, 1997, and November 6, 1997. Additional, non-flyby observations, will be made this September and November, and in April, June, and September, 1997). The first time Galileo was close to Europa (late last year), NASA mysteriously canceled its scheduled report regarding the Europa probe. Then, at the "Meeting of the Committee for Space Research" in Birmingham, UK, on July 18, Professor Steven Squyres, NASA planetary scientist, discussed the possibility of life on Europa USING HOAGLAND'S LOGIC (i.e., "Europa Concept") from 16 years ago (1980). According to the Enterprise Mission press release, Squyres speculated in his presentation that "[in Europa's ocean] biological activity may... be powered by geothermal heat at the center of the planet, much like the thermophilic, heat-loving bacteria and isolated biological communities recently discovered near submarine volcanoes on Earth...." In Hoagland's "Europa Concept" paper from 1980 (published in "Star and Sky" magazine and mentioned in Arthur C. Clarke's sequel to the famed "2001"), almost exactly the same concept is presented:
"During the last few years the development of deep-diving submarines has opened the floors of Earth's deepest oceans to exploration. Several miles down, in eternal darkness and under crushing pressures, living creatures exist, sustained by a constant rain of dead organisms that drift down from the abundance of life at the ocean's sunlit surface. Without such sustenance from above, life in the depths was assumed to be impossible -- thus apparently ruling out Europa as an abode of life because of its solid casing of ice. But recent findings have overturned this concept...."Near the rift systems that lie along divisions between plates in our planet's crust, molten magma wells up, creating warm water vents... producing one of the most fertile crucibles for living organisms known on Earth... about four times greater than in productive surface ocean waters....
"Europa's ocean, according to the line of reasoning in this article, potentially has all the ingredients to permit the existence of similar internally-nurtured oases of life. Only further exploration -- on both Europa and Earth -- will tell us if there are two life-bearing worlds in the solar system..."
(excerpted from the Enterprise Mission press release July 23, 1996, quoting parts of "Europa Concept")
Squyres stated that his hypothesis was based on a "personal examination of 16-year-old Voyager photography, under a formal contract with NASA." This is not good. Stealing others' work is a big "no no" in the scientific community and it is likely that Steven Squyres was aware of Hoagland's "Europa Concept" when he basically presented Hoagland's idea as his own. (In 1988, Hoagland and Squyres debated on CBS's "Nightwatch" news program.) What prompted Squyres to act as he did? Richard Hoagland speculated that this weird move was part of NASA's attempt to get Hoagland out of the picture by the time they announce there is life on Europa. NASA may have found evidence of life when Galileo first probed the Jupiter moon but withheld the information.... Not too surprising. Life outside Earth is big, big news. They need to treat it carefully. However, a bigger problem for NASA is that the concept of life on Europa is closely associated with Richard Hoagland who also accuses NASA of withholding information regarding artificial structures on Mars and the Moon. If they announce that life exists on Europa, the media would certainly focus on Hoagland and praise him for his insight, leading to increased attention on Hoagland's more recent claims of possible artificial structures on Mars and the moon. Obviously, this is not good for NASA or the government. They can't let the public know about the big conspiracies surrounding Mars and the moon. So what do they do? They let one of their own (NASA) people try to steal Hoagland's idea regarding life on Europa. However, Hoagland is already aware of the situation and is trying to spread the word. Since Hoagland's "Europa Concept" was published in "Star and Sky" and used in one of Arthur C. Clarke's books, it's not likely that this (possible) plan by NASA will work.
As an aside, it is also worth noting that on April Fool's Day this year, America Online did a well-done, fake news story that reported Galileo found life on Jupiter. It created quite a buzz in cyberspace. This may have been designed to check the reaction of the general public to the idea of life beyond earth and also to let the population get more used to the idea of ET life.
And now, the announcement regarding life on Mars. This could be the final stage of preparation before the announcement of life on Europa but I think it's also another step of a larger plan unfolding. I think this particular part of the plan is to let the general public know that there once was life on Mars in the past, before they announce that there is life on Europa now. It is less shocking to be told that there was, in the past, life on another planet, than to be told that there is life outside planet earth, right now, in our solar system.
CONSPIRACIES SURROUNDING MARS
The Mars controversy began in 1976 with NASA's Viking mission (Viking 1 and 2) to Mars. The primary mission objectives were to obtain high-resolution images of the Martian surface, characterize the structure and composition of the atmosphere and surface, and search for evidence of life. It was the images from Viking of a region on Mars called "Cydonia" that started the controversy of the "monuments of Mars." The pictures of Cydonia from Viking showed some highly-anomalous structures such as the "face" and the "pyramid," etc. Some researchers (including Richard Hoagland and his team since 1983) investigated the images in-depth and concluded it is highly probable that the structures are artificial. However, NASA has basically dismissed these ideas as "unscientific." Curiously, as I mentioned earlier, in Professor Stanley McDaniel's "McDaniel Report," the investigations into the anomalous objects in Cydonia were done very scientifically, and NASA's explanation for the dismissal of the those claims were baseless, misleading, and unscientific. Why did NASA not take the Cydonian anomalies seriously? Or did they? Their strange reaction seems to suggest that there was something going on behind the scenes and that NASA knew more than what they told us about the Red Planet. NASA's next mission to Mars was "Mars Observer" (launched in 1992).
The Mysterious Disappearance of the Mars Observer
The controversial Martian anomalies in the Cydonia region could clearly have been verified or falsified using the Mars Observer, if NASA had wanted. Of course, they didn't plan to specifically probe the Cydonian region with the Mars Observer but with "The McDaniel Report" published just prior to the Mars Observer mission, the pressure was certainly on NASA to further investigate the Martian anomalies. What happened next was the mysterious disappearance of Mars Observer. It was very close to reaching Mars when it disappeared. No one knows for sure what happened. NASA speculated that there was a mechanical malfunction. But things are not always what they seem.
In 1992, the Mars Observer was launched and headed toward Mars. In 1993, when Mars Observer almost reached Mars, all communication between the spacecraft and Earth stopped for some unknown reason. The final attempt at locating the spacecraft was on September 21, 1993, when commands were issued to activate the "Mars Balloon Relay Experiment." The experiment contained a small omni-directional beacon which might be detected on Earth. No response was detected. On October 29, flight controllers ended their operations and the Mars Observer Flight Team was disbanded. The Mars Observer was officially declared "lost."
Richard Hoagland disagrees.
Hoagland's Conspiracy Scenario
1. After the spaceshuttle, Challenger, exploded in 1986, nobody was launching anything for two and one-half years. Everything was grounded. The military was as dependent on the shuttle to launch its satellites as NASA; both agencies paid a price when the shuttle was not scheduling missions.
2. In Fall, 1988, the U.S. signed an agreement with the Soviet Union, under the Reagan Administration, to cooperate and collaborate on space data.
3. The very same afternoon the document was signed in 1988, NASA headquarters turned around and told JPL to postpone trying to launch the Mars Observer for two years, 1990-1992.
4. At the same time during Fall, 1988, the Pentagon suddenly says, "Well, we're such good guys, we're gonna make way on the shuttle for the Hubble Space Telescope." Thus the Hubble Space Telescope was put in the queue ahead of a military satellite scheduled for launch in Spring, 1990. (A civilian project ahead of a postponed military project? Hmm...) It must be important to them. However, after it was launched in orbit around Earth, they "discovered" that the mirror/lens of the Hubble was flawed. If it was so important, why did they wait three long years to fix Hubble's "flawed" mirror?
Richard Hoagland says:
"The idea that NASA did not test the hell out of this (Hubble's) mirror and it launched it not knowing it was flawed, is frankly an insult to every American tax payer... a MAJOR insult! So then you gotta tell yourself 'why in the world, would NASA deliberately lie?' Somebody in NASA... remember we're not talking about all of NASA. Well, let me tell you what happened. When the mirror problem was "discovered," the first thing NASA did was to move in on the contractor... and confiscated, impounded, and sealed all the contractor records of their tests. And all we have had is NASA versions of those tests. There has never been any independent review outside of NASA of what went wrong with Hubble."The head of the NASA review panel... that NASA set up to decide what went wrong, how they blew it... was a gentleman at JPL, the director of JPL, L. Allen (sp?). He just happened to have come to JPL from a previous post in the U.S. government, which was head of the most secret agency of government, the NSA.... This man knows how to keep a secret. He controls that panel."
5. In 1992, the Mars Observer was finally launched and it almost got to Mars. When it was ready to begin its orbit around Mars, it was reported "lost." Of course, it is possible that it was just one of those accidents, but it is the way some officials in NASA handled the situation that makes this incident look suspicious. For example, although they apparently tried to fix the main computer after the communication between the spacecraft and earth was lost, NASA did not reboot the computer (It's not clear to me what happened technically), although it was suggested by their own person in charge of fixing the problem. But it was ignored by those higher-ranking officials. Many of the decisions didn't make much sense and it seemed like they didn't do everything they could to save/restore the spacecraft. Their reason for not doing so was that the onboard computer program might have been lost in the process of rebooting. Hoagland said this answer was not sufficient because they had nothing to lose by trying. The fact that they would not reboot suggests that there was a secret, secondary program. Hoagland hypothesized that a secret back-up program existed in Mars Observer's back-up computer and someone secretly activated the program which took over when the radio signal was turned off. Turning off the radio was an officially-planned procedure but, according to Hoagland, is something you "just don't do," and was totally against common procedure practiced for years. This secret back-up program probably took over the mission and it went on to survey Mars/Cydonia.
6. Because of the delay, when the Mars Observer was launched and reached Mars, the geometry of the Earth/Mars system was such that Mars was about to go behind the sun (as seen from earth, roughly November, 1993 through February, 1994). In the original timeframe, this would not have occurred. (This is important and will be explained in #8)
7. The Hubble Space Telescope was probably deliberately sabotaged and they had already planned to tell everybody that there was something wrong with Hubble's mirror, so that three years later, astronauts would have to go up and "fix" it. But there was likely nothing wrong with the mirror. It was a ruse designed to justify the manned visit, in December, 1994, to the Hubble Telescope by astronauts. Had the Mars Observer been in position and orbiting Mars, it would have had many pictures by that time (i.e., Cydonia, the Face, etc., that may have proved the existence of extraterrestrial or of an advanced ancient civilization).
How would the Mars Observer send photographs back to Earth?
8. The Mars Observer had a rare capability of sending out laser-beam signals. It could be easily reprogrammed to code the transmission of secret Cydonian images on the laser, and beam them half way across the solar system to the Hubble Telescope. And Hubble, in earth orbit, could be used as a "optical light bucket" to catch the laser signal sent by the Mars Observer using a device called a "high speed photometer" which was carried by the Hubble Telescope. The high-speed photometer could detect a flickering, coded laser beam blinking at 100,000 times/second (=100,000 bits/second). The only telescope on earth that would be able to see Mars or this kind of signal would have been one orbiting Earth. No telescope on Earth could intercept the signals because Mars was so close to the Sun that they would pick up nothing but noise (late 1993-early 1994). The Hubble Space Telescope was the only possible receiver for the laser signal from the Mars Observer because of the Sun/Mars/Earth geometry at that time.
9. Coincidentally, the one instrument the astronauts removed from Hubble and brought back to earth from their repair mission was the high speed photometer. They replaced one instrument and one instrument only, the high speed photometer. And then someone on Earth very likely downloaded the computer/photometer, wiped the memory, and then took the disk with all the information/photographs to the CIA, etc.
But why Hubble? Why didn't they use
other spy satellites the U.S. military launched?10. First, how many of those military satellites had (or needed) the high speed photometer that could detect a laser beam/signal from Mars near the Aun? (likely none). Second, even if one of the satellites did have a high speed photometer, how would NASA secretly get the information stored in the photometer back to Earth? They wouldn't want to use a radio signal to Earth because it could be intercepted. Why not sabotage one of the military satellites like they probably did with the Hubble Telescope? Because, remember, all space projects were behind schedule since the Discovery accident, thus the military didn't want to waste any of their military satellites, especially when one couldn't be really sure when or if the Mars Observer would be launched. So they chose a civilian satellite/telescope which they could waste if they wanted to (and they did, for three years).
CONTINUING CONSPIRACY
Now, in 1996, after the Mars Observer, the conspiracy still seems to be going strong. But the difference is that NASA and the government has entered into a new phase of dealing with the extraterrestrial issue. The focus seems to have shifted from secrecy to a tightly-controlled release of information concerning ET life. Why? That is hard to say but three possibilities come to mind:
1. They want to tell the truth, but carefully.2. They are forced to reveal the existence of ETs for some reason.
3. They are using the information as a tool to control the masses
Whichever the reason (personally, I feel it is a combination of numbers two and three), I think the new phase basically began with the "Alien Autopsy" film shown all over the world in August, 1995. It created world wide controversy and heated discussion. Whether or not the film is authentic is not the point so much as stimulating discussion; forcing people to think about the possibility and implications of the film being authentic. (I feel there will be more evidence to authenticate the film in the near future.) Then, one year later in July-August, 1996, the film "Independence Day" (in which evil ETs try to invade Earth but are counter-attacked by humans) came to movie theaters and became a huge hit, and NASA announces that there probably was life on Mars in the past. This again drew the attention of the general public. ETs are now a hot topic and the subject is no longer laughed at.
So, what's next (besides the possible announcement regarding life on Europa)? Coincidentally, NASA will launch a probe to Mars (the Mars Global Surveyor) in November of this year (1996) and another one (Mars Pathfinder) in December. Curiously, the Mars Pathfinder will land on the Red Planet on July 4, 1997 -- almost exactly one year from the opening of the film "Independence Day" and NASA's announcement of life on Mars, and two years from the airing of the "Alien Autopsy" film. I now feel this one-year interval pattern is how this controlled release of ET information will play out. This speculation (i.e., Pathfinder being part of the plan) is supported by some interesting aspects of the Pathfinder mission.
Hyperdimensional Physics and the Mars Pathfinder
Excerpt from Richard Hoagland's website:
"One of the most surprising results of the continuing 14-year-old "Enterprise" investigation of potential solar system "ET artifacts," has been the rediscovery as part of that investigation of a little-known 100-year-old scientific discipline now clearly outlined in the "ruins" --"The field of "hyperdimensional physics."
"This is a physics based on geometric and mathematical foundations which involves other spatial dimensions -- ergo the term, "hyperdimensional" physics. The field itself began over 100 years ago, as part of a burgeoning scientific inquiry by Nineteenth-Century mathematicians and physicists into theoretical "non-Euclidian" geometries (geometries involving spatial dimensions in addition to "length, breadth and height"), and a set of specifically predicted physical interactions of energy and matter determined by those "non-Euclidian geometries."
"In the truest sense, these early theories and confirming (though now, remarkably, ignored) Nineteenth-Century laboratory data can be viewed as the first scientific attempt at a "grand unified theory" of physical reality.
"Imagine the shock, then, as this investigation rediscovered -- in 1988 -- identical hyperdimensional geometric indicators to an identical hyperdimensional physics... amid "the Monuments of Mars!"
Furthermore, according to Hoagland, tetrahedral geometry (a tetrahedron is a pyramid with an equilateral triangle base) which is hypothesized to be the primary message encoded in the geometry of the Cydonia complex on Mars and the Moon. This geometry, according to Hoagland, is how the "hyperdimensional" energy interacts with our dimensions.
Here is, roughly, how it works. Put an imaginary tetrahedron in a sphere with one of the vertices touching the north or south pole. And if the size of the tetrahedron is just right so that the other three vertices touch the surface of the sphere, the contact points will be at 19.5 degrees North/South latitude. Then if you rotate this sphere at a high speed, something weird happens that cannot be explained by our current physics. It creates energy within the sphere out of nowhere. Richard Hoagland suspects this tetrahedral form is an energy conduit within planets. At 19.5 degrees, where the tetrahedron touches the surface of the sphere, is coincidentally the area where most dramatic planetary activities take place -- probably the physical manifestations of the tetrahedral energy grid within planets/stars. Here are some examples (source: http://www.waldonet.net.mt/~mufor/plananom.htm):
EARTH -- The Hawaiian Islands/MaunaKea volcano (one of the most active volcanoes) at about 19.6 degrees North latitude.The MOON -- A unique "mare-life" lava extrusion, Tsiolkovskii is at 19.6 degrees South latitude.
The SUN -- The peak latitude of the 11-year sunspot cycle and solar temperature emission occurs, roughly, at 19.5 degrees North and South.
MARS -- The solar system's biggest volcano, Olympus Mons on Mars, is at 19.3 degrees North latitude.
VENUS -- Alpha and Beta Regio, volcanoes on Venus suspected to be active, are at 19.5 degrees.
JUPITER -- The Great Red Spot is, roughly, at 19.5 degrees South latitude.
NEPTUNE -- The Great Dark Spot is roughly at 19.5 degrees South latitude.
So what has this got to do with the secret plan? There is a direct connection: the Mars Pathfinder, due to arrive on Mars on July 4, 1997, will land on Mars at 19.5 degrees North latitude, and the shape of the lander will be tetrahedral! What a series of coincidences! Here are excerpts from the Mars Pathfinder status reports that present the rationale for choosing this latitude:
"As previously announced, the project has decided to land where Ares Vallis opens into Chryse Planitia on Mars (19.5 degrees North latitude, 32.8 degrees West longitude). The rationale for choosing this location is that it represents a place where there is the potential for sampling a wide variety of different rocks that make up the planet Mars in the small area accessible to the rover (a few tens of meters).""Since the spacecraft is solar-powered, the best site is one with maximum sunshine and in July, 1997, the sun will be directly over the 15 degrees North latitude region of the planet."
First of all, I can't imagine that this choice of precisely 19.5 degrees latitude being coincidence. It could've been 19 degrees or 20 degrees or whatever, but no, they chose 19.5 degrees. And even though NASA tries to make it sound as if 19.5 degrees is a logical choice, there seems to be a hole in their argument:
1. NASA scientists/engineers admit this mission is 80-90 percent engineering/testing. They could have landed anywhere to do the same job. It should not be that important for Pathfinder to land where it can analyze "wide variety of different rocks."2. They, in a way, constrained themselves to choose a landing site close to 15 degrees North latitude by scheduling the mission as they did.
So, what's really happening here? Why did they choose to land at 19.5 degrees latitude using a tetrahedral lander? Is some person or group within NASA aware of hyperdimensional physics and its validity? Did they discover the new physics from the structures on Mars also? If so, what are they trying to accomplish (unofficially) by landing at latitude 19.5 degrees? Could it be that those who are controlling this behind the scenes want to provide definitive evidence for life on Mars and there is a greater possibility of finding the evidence at latitude 19.5 degrees because of the higher energy level there? Whatever it is, there likely is a hidden purpose behind the Mars Pathfinder mission.
After Pathfinder, the Mars Global Surveyor will arrive on Mars around September, 1997, and will start its mapping operation in January, 1998. This mapping operation will continue for about two years. The Global Surveyor will take images (some high resolution, some lower resolution) of the entire planet. It seems likely that the region of Cydonia will be also surveyed and NASA will finally tell us that the anomalous structures in Cydonia are indeed artificial, and that there were intelligent beings on Mars in the past.
OVERVIEW OF POSSIBLE HIDDEN PLAN
STEP ONE, 1995 -- In August, 1995, the very controversial "Alien Autopsy" film airs on television around the world, and is watched by many people world-wide. The authenticity of the film is still not clear although there probably will be more evidence to authenticate the film.
STEP TWO, 1996 -- In July, 1996, the film "Independence Day" becomes a megahit. In August, 1996, NASA announces they found strong circumstantial evidence for life on Mars more than three billion years ago.
STEP THREE, 1996-1997 -- Life on Europa announcement by NASA
STEP FOUR, JULY-AUGUST, 1997 -- Mars Pathfinder lands on Mars on July 4, and will investigate the landing area for about a month. Also, NASA will announce that they have found more (definitive?) evidence of past life on Mars.
STEP FIVE, 1998 TO 1999 -- The Mars Global Surveyor that arrived on Mars around September, 1997, and began mapping operation in January, 1998, sends clear images of Mars to Earth. Around August(?), 1998, NASA will announce that they have found evidence that the anomalous structures in Cydonia are indeed artificial and that they were designed by intelligent beings.
FINAL STEP, 1998-200? -- It will be announced that there are intelligent beings living on/in Mars and there will be an official contact between the two races. We'll know much more about the real history of the Earth and our own species. These revelations will be assisted by new ancient discoveries made around the world (e.g., the chamber under the Sphinx, the pyramids, etc.).
Unfortunately, it seems that this incredible revelation will first be misused by those running the show to mislead and control. Also, it is possible that there will be some unexpected events that will alter/quicken this (possible) plan and the final step above will be forced to occur a lot sooner (1997-1999).
Nevertheless, our Earth has been pregnant for some time and now it is ready to give birth to a new awareness, a new age.
© Copyright 1996 Goro Adachi. Used with permission. Goro Adachi's has produced the "Prophetic Insights website." If you would like to receive future prophecy updates by email, contact Goro Adachi.